Defining a public health approach to substance use: Perspectives from professionals and practitioners across Canada.

BACKGROUND: While increasingly referenced in the literature and policy discussions, a "public health approach" (PHA) to substance use has been inconsistently defined or remained undefined. As part of a larger project on building the capacity to implement a PHA to substance use, we aimed to understand how professionals and practitioners across Canada who work with or whose work directly impacts the lives of people who use substances conceptualize a PHA. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional national online survey of public health professionals, public safety professionals, health and social service providers, and other relevant professionals and practitioners. The survey contained closed- and open-ended questions designed to gauge familiarity and comfort with application of a PHA to substance use, and perspectives on an organizational definition of such an approach. Survey recruitment was active between May and July 2021. Data analysis included descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1041 surveys were completed. Most respondents (76 %) reported having heard of a PHA to substance use, as it was defined. Over half (54 %) indicated a high level of comfort with applying such an approach within their work. In relation to defining a PHA to substance use, the following thematic suggestions emerged from respondent's open-ended answers: explicitly recognize people with lived/living experience of substance use; incorporate trauma-informed understanding and acknowledge the varied underlying reasons for substance use; decolonize approaches to substance use and empower communities; and consider a more critical appraisal of a PHA and the terminology in its definition. CONCLUSION: Empirically unpacking multi-stakeholder understandings of a PHA to substance use can help to inform a more cohesive definition and build the consensus needed for more effective, coordinated, and community-led responses to substance use. Future work, especially qualitative research, will provide richer and more practical understandings of a PHA to substance use.

Validation and endorsement of health system performance measures for opioid use disorder in British Columbia, Canada: A Delphi panel study.

Background: Limited data exists on the performance of the healthcare system in opioid use disorder (OUD). We evaluated the face validity and potential risks of a set of health system performance measures for OUD collaboratively with clinicians, policymakers and people with lived experience of opioid use (PWLE) in the interest of establishing an endorsed set of measures for public reporting. Methods: Through a two-stage Delphi-panel approach, a panel of clinical and policy experts validated and considered 102 previously constructed OUD performance measures for endorsement using information on measurement construction, sensitivity analyses, quality of evidence, predictive validity, and feedback from local PWLE. We collected quantitative and qualitative survey responses from 49 clinicians and policymakers, and 11 PWLE. We conducted inductive and deductive thematic analysis to present qualitative responses. Results: A total of 37 measures of 102 were strongly endorsed (9/13 cascade of care, 2/27 clinical guideline compliance, 17/44 healthcare integration, and 9/18 healthcare utilization measures). Thematic analysis of responses revealed several themes regarding measurement validity, unintended consequences, and key contextual considerations. Overall, measures related to the cascade of care (excluding opioid agonist treatment dose tapering) received strong endorsements. PWLE highlighted barriers to accessing treatment, undignified aspects of treatment, and lack of a full continuum of care as their concerns. Conclusion: We defined 37 endorsed health system performance measures for OUD and presented a range of perspectives on their validity and use. These measures provide critical considerations for health system improvement in the care of people with OUD.

Connect 2 Care, a Novel Community Outreach Program for Vulnerably Housed Patients With High Acute Care Use: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.

Introduction: Vulnerably housed individuals, especially those experiencing homelessness, have higher acute care use compared with the general population. Despite available primary care and social services, many face significant challenges accessing needed services. Connect 2 Care (C2C) is a novel transitional case management program that includes registered nurses and health navigators with complementary expertise in chronic disease management, mental health and addictions, social programs, community health, and housing, financial, transportation and legal resources. C2C bridges acute care and community services to improve care coordination. Methods and Analysis: We will perform a mixed-methods evaluation of the C2C program according to the Donabedian framework of structure, process and outcome, to understand how program structure and process, coupled with contextual factors, influence outcomes in a novel intervention. Eligible patients are homeless or unstably housed adults with complex health conditions and high acute care use. Change in emergency department visit rate 12-months after program enrolment is the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes include 12-month post-enrolment hospital admissions, cumulative hospital days, health-related quality of life, housing status, primary care attachment and substance use. Qualitative methods will explore experiences with the C2C program from multiple perspectives and an economic evaluation will assess cost-effectiveness. Discussion: Academic researchers partnered with community service providers to evaluate a novel transitional case management intervention for vulnerably housed patients with high acute-care use. The study uses mixed-methods to evaluate the Connect 2 Care program according to the Donabedian framework of structure, process and outcome, including an assessment of contextual factors that influence program success. Insights gained through this comprehensive evaluation will help refine the C2C program and inform decisions about sustainability and transferability to other settings in Canada.

A Portrait of Late Life Homelessness in Calgary, Alberta.

Le présent article vise à évaluer les problèmes de santé des Calgariens de plus de 50 ans en situation d'itinérance chronique, à identifier les manques en matière de services pour cette population et à cerner les prédicteurs de l'itinérance chronique, tels que les traumatismes durant l'enfance, qui pourraient être atténués par des modifications touchant les politiques ou la prestation de services. Des personnes en situation d'itinérance, dont trois cents provenaient de refuges d'urgence, ont été recrutées à Calgary (Canada) à hiver 2016. Les logiciels Excel et SPSS ont été utilisés pour l'analyse des statistiques descriptives des participants qui ont été séparés en deux groupes, soit les répondants de 50 ans et plus (n = 142) et ceux de moins de 50 ans (n = 158). Plus de la moitié des participants étaient en situation d'itinérance continue depuis plus de dix ans. Les personnes plus âgées ont fait état de problèmes de santé complexes et d'obstacles importants pour l'accès aux soins de santé, associés notamment à leurs problèmes financiers, aux listes d'attente et au fait de ne pas recevoir d'aide malgré leurs demandes. Les répondants plus âgés ont rapporté des taux de traumatismes durant l'enfance inférieurs à ceux des répondants plus jeunes, bien que la moyenne de ces taux soit 2,5 fois supérieure à celle de la population générale. La reconnaissance des effets croisés et cumulatifs de l'itinérance de long terme et de l'âge pourrait guider la modification des politiques visant à réduire les cloisonnements entre les services publics. Étant donné que les personnes âgées en situation d'itinérance sont plus à risque de mourir prématurément, elles devraient être priorisées par les programmes d'aide au logement. Des interventions adaptées au contexte culturel et tenant compte des traumatismes seraient nécessaires pour répondre aux besoins à la fois variés et complexes de ce groupe vulnérable.This article aims to evaluate and assess the health issues of Calgarians over the age of 50 who are experiencing chronic homelessness, determine their unmet service needs, and assess whether there are predictors of chronic homelessness (such as childhood trauma) that could be addressed with changes to policy or service delivery. Three hundred participants were recruited from emergency shelters, as well as a from a small group of rough sleepers in Calgary, Canada in the winter of 2016. Excel and SPSS were used for analysis beginning with descriptive statistics for the samples of respondents who are 50 and older (n = 142) and under the age of 50 (n = 158). More than half of participants had been homeless continually for more than 10 years. Older adults reported complex health issues and significant barriers to accessing health care including finances, wait lists, and asking for help but not receiving it. Older adults reported lower rates of childhood trauma than their younger counterparts, yet the average was two and half times that of the general population. Recognition of the intersecting and cumulative effects of long-term homelessness and age could inform changes to policy to reduce siloes around public systems. Given that older adults are at higher risk for an early death, they should be prioritized for housing programs. Culturally appropriate and trauma-informed interventions are necessary to address the diverse and complex needs of this vulnerable group.

Transfers from intensive care unit to hospital ward: a multicentre textual analysis of physician progress notes.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about documentation during transitions of patient care between clinical specialties. Therefore, we examined the focus, structure and purpose of physician progress notes for patients transferred from the intensive care unit (ICU) to hospital ward to identify opportunities to improve communication breaks. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study in ten Canadian hospitals. We analyzed physician progress notes for consenting adult patients transferred from a medical-surgical ICU to hospital ward. The number, length, legibility and content of notes was counted and compared across care settings using mixed-effects linear regression models accounting for clustering within hospitals. Qualitative content analyses were conducted on a stratified random sample of 32 patients. RESULTS: A total of 447 patient medical records that included 7052 progress notes (mean 2.1 notes/patient/day 95% CI 1.9-2.3) were analyzed. Notes written by the ICU team were significantly longer than notes written by the ward team (mean lines of text 21 vs. 15, p < 0.001). There was a discrepancy between documentation of patient issues in the last ICU and first ward notes; mean agreement of patient issues was 42% [95% CI 31-53%]. Qualitative analyses identified eight themes related to focus (central point - e.g., problem list), structure (organization, - e.g., note-taking style), and purpose (intention - e.g., documentation of patient course) of the notes that varied across clinical specialties and physician seniority. CONCLUSIONS: Important gaps and variations in written documentation during transitions of patient care between ICU and hospital ward physicians are common, and include discrepancies in documentation of patient information.